Around a month ago, I attempted setting up Debian on my computer again. Because of trouble getting X to run, though, and school work starting to pile up again, I eventually went back to using Ubuntu. Mistakes, attempts, and then there was this day I installed Windows XP on a whim because I was dying to continue experiencing the seventh final fantasy (It is my first time.) and had zero patience to try to get a PlayStation emulator to work well on my system. Weeks went by.
Last night, again on a whim, I decided to back up my data, clear my hard disk (just the partition table, actually), partition my hard disk exactly the way I realized I wanted it, and then install Debian again. It was either “do” or “die for a while”, just decide what to do afterwards if I still could not get X to work. Surprisingly though, last night, it was so easy – I just did whatever made sense and, before I knew it, X was up. Now, I have Debian, and I am no longer with the haunting thought that my system might be doing things that I really do not want it to do. And since I am on that, here is a bit that I wrote some weeks ago:
I am not against Ubuntu, I think it is a great desktop system. In fact, I still recommend it to a lot of people who are interested in open source software and/or GNU/Linux. However, for myself, I still prefer Debian. I itch not knowing my system, and I am more comfortable with more direct control of it: I want to know what software I have running, what packages I have installed, and the actual configuration of the services I run.
I think it boils down to what is user-friendly for the specific user. Ubuntu may be user-friendly for the regular users, but Debian is for the developers, the (computer) geeks, systems administrators, and the paranoid. I find that hitting that aspect of the Ubuntu vs. Debian issue is pointless.
Then, of course, window manager galore. I now understand why Paolo spends weeks tweaking window manager after window manager just to get the environment that he wants. I am on a Debian high.